Legal Opinion

Hall v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1922No. Civ. No. 2527PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was brought to rescind, on the ground of fraud, a written contract for the sale of certain nursery stock, and the appeal is by the defendant from the judgment upon the judgment-roll. Said written contract' provided:

“Agreement, made and dated at Waterford, California, November 2, 1920, between Robert Mitchell of Ceres, Calif., hereinafter described" as the seller, and H. V. M. Hall, of Waterford, California, hereinafter described as the purchaser.

“Witness, that the seller agrees to sell and convey, and the purchaser agrees to purchase all that block of nursery stock grown and now…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stonemets v. HeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Gray v. . Richmond Bicycle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Rosin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Laraway v. First National Bank of La VerneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Wishnick v. FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API