Murphy Exploration & Production Co. v. United States Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
Murphy Exploration and Production Co. (“Murphy”) appeals the District Court’s dismissal, for lack of jurisdiction, of its claim that the Department of the Interior (“DOI”) failed to reimburse it for mining royalty overpayments. Murphy’s lawsuit invokes the Federal Oñ and Gas Royalty Simplification and Fairness Act (“FOGRS-FA”), which confers jurisdiction on courts to consider challenges to “administrative proceedings” that the agency fails to resolve within 33 months…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Barnes, JohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Nyunt v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.