Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Hegar
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Devine
*92A taxpayer that conducts business in multiple states must apportion its business revenue among the states in which it does business. For the Texas franchise tax, section 171.106 of the Tax Code provides for such apportionment under a single-factor formula, which compares the taxpayer's gross receipts derived from its Texas business to its gross receipts everywhere. Another provision of the Tax Code, section 141.001, adopts the Multistate Tax Compact. This Compact sets out a three-factor formula for apportioning "business income" for an "income tax" and provides that a taxpayer subject to a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ivan I. Smith, Jr. and Gloria G. Smith v. Kimberly L. Robinson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, State of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
- Dailing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Health Net, Inc. v. Dep't of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Brazos River Authority and the State of Texas v. City of Houston And Sylvester Turner, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
- Brazos River Authority and the State of Texas v. City of Houston And Sylvester Turner, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.