Legal Opinion
Melbourne v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In re Melbourne)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 19, 1989No. Bankruptcy No. 88-13246S; Adv. No. 89-0199SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
Before us is another proceeding involving the most prolific protagonist of contests raising thought-provoking issues of interpretation of consumer-law in this court, MID-PENN CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY (hereinafter “Mid-Penn”).2 As in In re Nichols, Nos. 89-1445 and 89-1474 (3d Cir. Nov. 28, 1989) [893 F.2d 1331 (table)], aff'g, C.A. No. 88-1253, 1989 WL 46682 (E.D.Pa. April 28, 1989), aff'g, Bankr. No. 86-05809S, Adv. No. 87-0600S (Bankr.E.D.Pa. Nov. 10, 1987); In re Jones, 79 B.R. 233 (Bankr.E.D. Pa.1987); and In re Tucker, 74 B.R. 923 *524(…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MilbourneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hager v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999