Legal Opinion

Brown v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1975No. S.F. 23290PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*54Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

The question before us is whether the Governor may at his pleasure terminate the appointment of real party in interest, John Mayfield, as a public representative to the North Coast Regional Commission, The California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (Pub. Resources Code, § 27000 et seq.) does not establish a fixed term of service for members of regional coastal commissions either expressly or by implication. Government Code section 1301 provides that whenever the term of office is not fixed by law, that office is held at the pleasure of the appointing authority. As we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kenyon v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Sponogle v. CurnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Brennan v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API