Legal Opinion

Updike Investment Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1935No. 28968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action the plaintiff seeks a declaration of its rights under an insurance contract. The pleadings and evidence disclose that the defendant issued to the plaintiff a policy of insurance designated as a “Universal Standard Workmen’s Compensation Policy,” by which the defendant agreed to defend in the name and on behalf of plaintiff any suits or other proceedings brought against the plaintiff to recover any loss designated as a risk by the policy. One Eunice Roth brought an action against the plaintiff to recover an alleged damage of $50,000. The petition of Eunice Roth alleged that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Post v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Dobson v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Redick v. Peony ParkNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Raymark Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Updike Investment Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Johnson v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API