Martel Enterprises v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE LORENZ
delivered the opinion of the court:
After a jury trial, the judge entered a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff Martel Enterprises (Martel) on its claim for conversion and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Martin Myers on his claim for false imprisonment. Defendant, the City of Chicago (city), now appeals contending that: (1) its statutory immunity defense was applicable to Martel’s conversion claim; and (2) it should have been granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Myers’ false imprisonment claim. For the following reasons, we affirm in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re ThebusIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Villa v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Naiditch v. Shaf Home Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Lee v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Poris v. Lake Holiday Property Owners AssociationIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Title Industry Assurance Co., R.R.G. v. First American Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Reynolds v. Menard, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Ryan v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Hvorcik v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.