Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Menard, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 9, 2006No. 1-05-0176PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

After they were found not guilty on charges of retail theft, plaintiffs William (William) and Elizabeth (Elizabeth) Reynolds (collectively, plaintiffs) brought this action against defendant Menard, Inc., alleging that defendant was liable for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. A jury found for defendant and against plaintiffs on both counts and further indicated, by special interrogatories, that it found that defendant did not act with malice or without probable cause.

On plaintiffs’ motion, the trial judge, thereafter, entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Meerbrey v. Marshall Field & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rodgers v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Williams v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Stokes v. Board of Educ. of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Mercury Partners 90 BI, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Mosley v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Jeffrey Mannoia v. David G. Farrow, DetectiveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API