Wagner v. Duffy
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
This action comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Each party contends that there is no genuine issue of material fact left to be decided and that their side is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiffs have filed memorandums and a Local Rule 12(e) statement in support of its motions. The defendant has filed memorandums and both 12(e) and 12(f) statements. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the plaintiffs Wagner, Hampton, Owens, Petters, Dennis, and Brown prospective injunctive relief from…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Kirby v. SproulsDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1989
- Anderson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Barker v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009