Legal Opinion

Roussel v. Roussel

Rockingham County Circuit Court

Decided October 24, 2003No. Case No. CL00-12280Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge James V. Lane

This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant alleges in the Motion that the Plaintiffs claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata and/or by the doctrine of equitable estoppel and other policy considerations.

Facts and Stipulations

On November 16,2000, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Judgment against the Defendant, George Albert Roussel, IV, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for an alleged assault and battery upon her. The Defendant filed a Grounds of Defense as well as a Cross-Claim against the Plaintiff also requesting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Marshall Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Henriksen v. CameronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Cater v. CaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Nash v. OverholserIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API