Legal Opinion

Nash v. Overholser

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1988No. 16680PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

James Overholser appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment pursuant to an interlocutory appeal, wherein he asserts that the complaint filed by plaintiff, and former wife, Connie Nash, alleging five counts of assault and battery by him during the course of their marriage, was barred due to the res judicata effect of the decree of divorce entered between them. The court also granted partial summary judgment in favor of Overholser for Nash’s failure to file within the statute of limitations as to all but one count of assault and battery. The grant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Compton v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rudd v. RuddIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Duthie v. Lewiston Gun ClubIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Milbourn v. MilbournIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. McDonald v. BarlowIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Diamond v. Farmers Group, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hays v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API