Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1926No. 6927. [fn*]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, C. J.

Plaintiffs below- were B. R. Davis and W. W. Bates. Defendants below were Humble Oil & Refining Company and J*. L. Hill and wife, M. A. Hill. There were other defendants, but they are not involved in the appeal. The purpose of the suit was to reform an oil lease on 20 acres of land. The lease was dated October 4, 1921, and was what is termed a “commercial lease.” It was for a period of five years, or' as long thereafter as oil or gas was produced, in paying quantities. There was a down payment of $120 and -annual rentals of $30’ each. The date inserted for the. payment of the first annual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Hale v. HollonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cox v. Sinclair Gulf Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Farmers National Bank v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Hale v. HollonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grissom v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Leopard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Kimberly Development Corp. v. First State Bank of Greens BayouCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Hart v. EstelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API