Legal Opinion

Leopard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1949No. 14004PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAMER, Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs .below, sought a judgment decreeing null and void, for nonpayment of delay rentals and nondevelopment, a lease covering oil, gas and all other minerals, and to recover, free of such lease, a tract of 70 acres of land in the S. Sylvester Survey in Henderson County, Texas, plus damages for failure to release; and adversely claiming under said lease.

It was admitted that appellants own the surface rights and a fractional part of the royalty, and that appellees hold only such rights, if any, as they may now possess under an oil, gas and all other minerals…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Grissom v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bradley v. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. State Nat'l Bk. of Corpus Christi v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Spellman v. American Universal Investment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  2. Loeffler v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Western Oil Fields, Inc. v. Pennzoil United, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Tiller v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Hastings v. PichinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API