Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hollon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of McLennan County. Tried below before Hon. L. W. Goodrich.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

The statement of the nature and result of the suit made by appellant is correct, and is adopted by this court. It is as follows: “This suit was brought by appellant against appellees, W. R. and D. P. Hollon, to cancel a conveyance made by D. P. to W. R. Hollon.”

Plaintiff among other things, alleged that he (V. W. Hale) was the legal and equitable owner of certain real estate, situate in the city of Waco, McLennan County, by virtue of a deed from the sheriff of said county, dated December, 4, 1894; that certain persons owned and held several judgments for a large…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. March v. HuyterTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ryan v. Texas & Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Tefft v. . MunsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Hinson v. Ely Walker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Curtis v. AycockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Searcy v. Gwaltney Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. In re the Estate of CornellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API