Legal Opinion

Carroll v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1932No. 8846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

American Agricultural Chemical Company brought a petition for mandamus against Cecil E. Carroll doing business under the name and style of Dublin Bonded Warehouse, alleging that the defendant conducts a public warehouse for the receipt and storage of baled cotton; that on the receipt of the cotton he executes a bonded-warehouse receipt to the owner of the cotton, which receipt is “semi-negotiable;” that in the conduct of his business he issues receipts for the cotton stored, and keeps books as required by law, in which he enters an account of all of Ms transactions -relating to his business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp. v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Hodges v. PowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Bearden v. DavesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hall v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. EpsteinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Alto Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Rigby v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API