Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Harsch

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1421 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

This is an appeal by the Board of Commissioners of Ross Township (Board) from an order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas directing the township to adopt a curative amendment1 proposed by the pro se appellees, Joseph and Joan Harsch. The Harsches instituted this action because they wished to operate a Croup Day Care Home in their residence, and the Ross Township ordinance does not provide for such a facility anywhere in the township. By a 1976 amendment to its ordinance, the township permitted the operation of a Family Day Care Home, consisting of no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ellick v. Bd. of Spvrs., Worcester Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Martin v. Township of MillcreekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Snyder v. Railroad BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kee v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Briar Meadows Development, Inc. v. South Centre Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Coolbaugh Township Board of Supervisors v. TIAB Communications Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. In re Appeal of Marple Gardens, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Coolbaugh Tp. Sup'rs v. Tiab Com.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API