Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*73OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
As a result of an administrative proceeding commenced by appellant United Transportation Union, appellee railroads were directed to adopt weekly pay periods for certain of their employees, as required by Pennsylvania Act No. 43 of 1971.1 The railroads appealed this order to the Commonwealth Court, urging that the Act was invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution because it conflicted with the federal Railway Labor Act2 and because it invaded a field totally occupied and therefore preempted by the Railway Labor Act.3 They also…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Lewis v. School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.