Legal Opinion

Escofil v. Commissioner

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Noel Tancred Escofil instituted this action to challenge the constitutionality of certain taxing provisions of the Social Security Act. 1 Before the court is a motion by defendant Commissioner of Internal Revenue to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b), F.R.Civ.P., for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Escofil’s pro se initial pleading in this case consisted of the following:

“The Social Security Act is unconstitutional in that it prohibits me to freely exercise my religion in regards to Matt. 6:34.
“And those tax…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moss v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
  2. Chapman v. AlexanderDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API