Escofil v. Commissioner
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Noel Tancred Escofil instituted this action to challenge the constitutionality of certain taxing provisions of the Social Security Act. 1 Before the court is a motion by defendant Commissioner of Internal Revenue to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b), F.R.Civ.P., for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.
Escofil’s pro se initial pleading in this case consisted of the following:
“The Social Security Act is unconstitutional in that it prohibits me to freely exercise my religion in regards to Matt. 6:34.
“And those tax…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moss v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Chapman v. AlexanderDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1976