Chapman v. Alexander
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff, Howard L. Chapman, a well-to-do Shreveport podiatrist, here seeks to sue the United States upon his claim that his constitutional right to freedom of religion is being breached. Initially we raised the issue sua sponte whether a three-judge court should be convened to hear the constitutional argument plaintiff raises. In light of the jurisprudence and the bar against granting either an injunction or a declaratory judgment here (as discussed infra), we find no need to convene a three-judge court to consider defendants’ motion to dismiss.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Chapman v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977