Legal Opinion

Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 21, 2002No. 94-2202-JWLPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

• Introduction

Plaintiff filed this personal injury products liability action against defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“Reynolds”) claiming that defendant’s cigarettes caused his peripheral vascular disease (“PVD”) and addiction. Plaintiff asserted that Reynolds manufactured a defective product, failed to warn him that smoking causes addiction and PVD, negligently failed to test or research its product, fraudulently concealed the fact that smoking cigarettes causes addiction and PVD, and conspired with other members of the tobacco industry…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Deters v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. OXY USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pelman v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API