Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2005No. 02-3262Published

1DissentEbel, Circuit Judge

Although I join Sections I and II of the majority opinion, I respectfully dissent from Section III (affirming the jury verdict on Burton’s pre-1969 negligent failure to warn theory) and Section IV (affirming the jury verdict on Burton’s pre-1969 negligent failure to test theory).

I. Pre-1969 Negligent Failure to Warn Claim

The jury rendered a verdict in Mr. Burton’s favor on his pre-1969 negligent failure to warn claim. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 205 F.Supp.2d 1253, 1255 (D.Kan.2002). Reynolds argues, among other things, that (a) the statute of limitations bars Mr. Burton’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Davidson v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Wilcheck v. Doonan Truck & Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API