Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentEbel, Circuit Judge
Although I join Sections I and II of the majority opinion, I respectfully dissent from Section III (affirming the jury verdict on Burton’s pre-1969 negligent failure to warn theory) and Section IV (affirming the jury verdict on Burton’s pre-1969 negligent failure to test theory).
I. Pre-1969 Negligent Failure to Warn Claim
The jury rendered a verdict in Mr. Burton’s favor on his pre-1969 negligent failure to warn claim. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 205 F.Supp.2d 1253, 1255 (D.Kan.2002). Reynolds argues, among other things, that (a) the statute of limitations bars Mr. Burton’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Davidson v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Wilcheck v. Doonan Truck & Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.