Legal Opinion

Priess v. Fisherfolk

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 2, 1982No. C-1-80-588PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SPIEGEL, District Judge:

This case is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss or transfer (docs. 5, 7, 8, 33, 40). Plaintiff has filed an exhaustive memorandum in opposition (doc. 54) and defendants have filed memoranda in support (docs. 49, 50, 61, 62, 64). 1 Because the motions raise complex factual and legal issues involving multiple defendants from various jurisdictions, we will attempt to briefly outline the relevant history of this action.

I

At the heart of this complex inter-corporate and international case, is a relatively simple cause of action. In the late…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Checkrite, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  2. Sky Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  3. Giachetti v. HolmesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Grand TobaccoOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API