Grantham v. Cory (In Re Flamingo 55, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Gregory Grantham and John Saba appeal the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision 1 that they were not entitled to subrogation pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 509. 2 We affirm.
The bankruptcy court issued a lengthy and detailed opinion dealing with the facts and issues before it and we perceive no reason to iterate the details of its discussion. 3 Therefore, we adopt the bankruptcy court’s statements of facts in part II of its decision. In re Flamingo 55, 378 B.R. 893, 900-04 (Bankr.D.Nev.2007).
With one clarification and one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Crawford v. LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Flamingo 55, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leibowitz v. Hall (In re Hall)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- In re: Dennis Adrian VazquezUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013