Legal Opinion
Kirack v. City of Eureka
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1945No. Civ. 7121PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The city of Eureka has appealed from a judgment of $4,803, which was rendered against it in a suit for damages for personal injuries received by Mrs. Kirack, a pedestrian, as the result of falling over a loose board in a defective sidewalk, which board tilted and caught her foot as her daughter stepped upon the opposite end of it. The liability of the city is based on section 2 of the Statutes of 1923, page 675. (2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, p. 2630, Act 5619.) The cause was tried with a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs on an implied finding that the city was charged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Balkwill v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Silva v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Smith v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Jones v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Perry v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Gallipo v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.