Valcon II, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*480OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Plaintiff brought these consolidated actions pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988) (CDA). Defendant has moved to dismiss case No. 90-296 pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that plaintiff failed to comply with the certification requirement of the CDA and an implementing regulation. (No jurisdictional impediment is currently asserted with respect to case No. 91-1137.) For reasons given below, we conclude that the motion should be denied.
I
On April 1, 1987, the National Aeronautics and Space…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Aleman Food Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Universal Canvas, Inc. v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Universal Canvas, Inc. v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992