Universal Canvas, Inc. v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentCowen, Senior Circuit Judge
There has been unanimous recognition by the courts and by the boards of contract appeals that the purpose of the certification requirement in section 6 of the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1988), is to prevent the filing of fraudulent and unwarranted claims against the government, and that the burden of proof is on the contractor to establish that its certification complies with the CDA and FAR 33.207(c), its implementing regulation. Against that background of decisional law, this court has today reversed the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- The United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Aleman Food Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Valcon II, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991