Legal Opinion
People v. Staton
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 23, 1996No. 96SA113PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MULLARKEY, Justice.
The People bring this interlocutory appeal under C.A.R. 4.1 to challenge the trial court’s suppression of evidence seized pursuant to an automobile search warrant issued in North Carolina. The defendant-appellee, Andrew Thorpe Staton (Staton), was charged with one count of first degree felony murder, section 18-3-102(l)(b), 8B C.R.S. (1986), and one count of first degree murder after deliberation, section 18-S-102(l)(a), 8B C.R.S. (1995 Supp.). Staton moved to suppress all evidence obtained from the automobile search based on the insufficiency of the search warrant and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- People v. PittsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. KluhsmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. Mejia-MendozaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. DumasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.