Legal Opinion

Ammend v. County of Isanti

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1992No. C6-91-2024Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Respondent Ammend, an honorably discharged veteran, was discharged from his position in the Isanti County Sheriff’s Department without a hearing. He sought relief from the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, and the Department concluded that because Ammend was discharged from a position other than that of Chief Deputy he was entitled to the protections of the Veterans Preference Act. It ordered that Ammend be given full back pay and reinstated as a full-time non-Chief Deputy. Isanti County appeals from the department’s decision and reinstatement order.

FACTS

In August,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Sprague v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Gorecki v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API