Legal Opinion

Heigle v. Heigle

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2000No. 1999-CA-00007-SCTPublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

771 So.2d 341 (2000)

Roger HEIGLE

v.

Jo Ann HEIGLE.

No. 1999-CA-00007-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

November 2, 2000.

Robert S. Murphree, Jackson, Attorney for Appellant.

John H. Daniels, III, Greenville, Attorney for Appellee.

EN BANC.

PITTMAN, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND MATERIAL FACTS

¶ 1. Roger Heigle ("Roger") and Jo Ann Heigle ("Jo Ann") were granted a divorce on December 1, 1992. Roger appealed the chancellor's order to this Court on December 28, 1992. This Court vacated the judgment on both the appeal and cross-appeal and remanded with instructions to the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Newsom v. NewsomMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Harris v. Mississippi Valley State Univ.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Moss v. Batesville Casket Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McMillan v. RodriguezMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Jackson v. SuttonMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Williamson Ex Rel. Williamson v. KeithMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API