Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 2001No. 64, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Robert Allen Smith, petitioner, asserts that his federal and state constitutional right against self-incrimination was violated by the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument. We agree and shall hold that the prosecutor’s remarks were a direct comment on petitioner’s exercise of his privilege against self-incrimination. The error was not harmless, and a new trial is therefore in order.

In March, 1998, the home of Mr. and Mrs. Davis was burglarized and several items of property taken. The missing items included: a twenty-two caliber revolver, a shotgun, jewelry, coins, four…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Noura JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State of Maine v. Jomo WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
  3. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Whiting v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API