Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
Robert Allen Smith, petitioner, asserts that his federal and state constitutional right against self-incrimination was violated by the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument. We agree and shall hold that the prosecutor’s remarks were a direct comment on petitioner’s exercise of his privilege against self-incrimination. The error was not harmless, and a new trial is therefore in order.
In March, 1998, the home of Mr. and Mrs. Davis was burglarized and several items of property taken. The missing items included: a twenty-two caliber revolver, a shotgun, jewelry, coins, four…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Noura JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Maine v. Jomo WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.