Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Crawford Machine, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2012No. 2011-2040Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Holmes v. Crawford Machine, Inc., 134 Ohio St.3d 303,

2012-Ohio-5380.] HOLMES, APPELLANT, v. CRAWFORD MACHINE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Holmes v. Crawford Machine, Inc., 134 Ohio St.3d 303,

2012-Ohio-5380.] Workers’ compensation—R.C. 4123.512(F)—Once a claimant’s right to participate in the workers’ compensation fund has been established, a trial court does not abuse its discretion under R.C. 4123.512(F) by awarding the claimant reimbursement for costs related to the conditions for which the trier of fact determined the claimant was ineligible to participate in the fund. (No.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burrows v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Moore v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ward v. Kroger Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kilgore v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cave v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API