Legal Opinion

Kilgore v. Chrysler Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 2001No. Nos. 00-512 and 00-551PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

In this case, we face the question of whether travel expenses incurred in taking the deposition of an expert in a workers’ compensation appeal are reimbursable as a “cost of [a] legal proceeding” pursuant to R.C. 4123.512(F). We hold that travel expenses necessary for prosecuting a workers’ compensation appeal are reimbursable under R.C. 4123.512(F).

Factual and Procedural Background

On January 7, 1988, the appellee, William Kilgore, suffered a work-related injury while employed by appellant, Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”). Kilgore filed a workers’ compensation claim, and Chrysler recognized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Benda v. FanaOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. ColasurdOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cave v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Schuller v. United States Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Holmes v. Crawford Machine, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API