Legal Opinion
Hackett v. City of New Britain
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 11, 1984No. (2367)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff appeals 1 from the denial of his petition for an order of mandamus by which the plaintiff sought to compel the defendants to continue undiminished payment of his pension benefits. The defendants are the city of New Britain and the board of trustees of the New Britain firemen’s pension fund.
The plaintiff, Robert J. Hackett, was appointed to the position of substitute fireman in the New Britain fire department. Approximately one year later, on November 20,1950, he was made a full-time fireman. He then became a lieutenant in the fire department on May 24,1968. After obtaining the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Annette Heyman, Individually v. Robert S. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- A. Sangivanni & Sons v. F. M. Floryan & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Duksa v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hennessey v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Sansone v. CliffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jalowiec Realty Associates, L.P. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Golab v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Griffin v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.