Legal Opinion
Sheeran v. Ravella
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 6, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 5105PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.
Defendant moves to quash the return of service of summons and for dismissal of the complaint, F.R.C.P. 12(b)(5), 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that at the time and place she was, under the circumstances, immune from service of process in this action.
*412The problem arose in this fashion: While Joseph Sheeran and Angeline Sheeran were husband and wife residing in Wilkes-Barre in this district, funds earned by Joseph Sheeran were placed in a savings account and in two safe deposit boxes in Wilkes-Barre banks. Thereafter Angeline Sheeran was divorced from Joseph Sheeran,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Long v. AnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Page Co. v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mississippi Wood Preserving Co. v. RothschildCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spelbrink v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977