Legal Opinion

IMMEL v. TULSA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 2021Published

1Opinion of the Court

OSCN Found Document:IMMEL v. TULSA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY

IMMEL v. TULSA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY

2021 OK 39

Case Number: 116999

Decided: 06/22/2021

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Cite as: 2021 OK 39, __ P.3d __

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

Â

CRAIG IMMEL, TERRY YOUNG, HERB BEATTIE, and RAY PEARCEY, Plaintiffs/Appellants,

v.

TULSA PUBLIC FACILITIES, AUTHORITY, a Public Trust, and the CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, an Oklahoma Municipal Corporation, Defendants/Appellees.

ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API