City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civic Auditorium & Convention Center Ass'n
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, justice.
The parties to this litigation request that we clarify our opinion in regard to these points involved in our decision:
1. If the lease is amended to provide that the proceeds of ad valorem taxes cannot be required to be subjected to the payment of any rent due thereunder, will the lease as so amended nevertheless be in violation of the Arizona Constitution or the Arizona budget laws?
2. If the lease is amended to provide that all rent due thereunder shall be payable solely from the proceeds of excise taxes, will the lease as so amended nevertheless be in violation of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Stone v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Switzer v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- Libertarian Party of Wisconsin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Montana Wildlife Federation v. SagerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Eakin v. State Ex Rel. Capital Improvement Board of ManagersIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Long v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- City of Tucson v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.