Troutman v. Erlandson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff on his creditor’s bill and on defendants’ counterclaims. We affirm with some modification.
The facts are complicated and stem from the course of litigation in which these parties have been involved for over four years. We will try to state them as simply as possible. Plaintiff and Ralf Erlandson were partners in certain business ventures from 1971 to 1974. A partnership dissolution suit, based on a dissolution agreement, resulted in a 1975 decree which declared the rights and obligations of the parties as of September…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Killam v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Evans v. TrudeOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Pedah Company v. HuntOregon Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Matthew J. Casserino in Re Joani M. Casserino, Debtors, Ronald R. Sticka v. Matthew J. Casserino in Re Joani M. CasserinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sticka v. Casserino (In Re Casserino)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Patterson Lumber Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Reeves v. National Hydraulics Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Troutman v. ErlandsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.