Legal Opinion
Boas v. De Pue Warehouse Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1924No. Civ. No. 4618PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action to recover the sum of $465.20 paid under protest to a warehouseman for storage.
The controversy arose out of the following transaction: In the year 1913 three Cole automobiles were shipped to San Francisco by the Cole Motor Car Company, Peoria, Illinois, the Santa Fe Railway Company being the carrier. The cars were consigned to Cole Motor Company at San Francisco, and the carrier was advised by the consignor to notify the latter company of their arrival. The consignor mailed the bill of lading with draft for purchase price attached to the consignee. The cars arrived, and the bill of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Duluth v. BloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Barker v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Security Bank of Minnesota v. Minneapolis Cold Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Western Bank v. Marion County Distilling Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- San Angelo Wine & Spirits Corp. v. South End Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1936
- Sampsell v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Brown Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931