Legal Opinion

San Angelo Wine & Spirits Corp. v. South End Warehouse Co.

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided August 18, 1936No. Civ. A. No. 830PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, P. J.

This case gives rise to the question whether a warehouseman may have a general lien, not only for charges for storage and ordinary services and expenditures incident to the business, but also for money advanced, in the case of liquors, for taxes, payable by the owner under the internal revenue laws. The determination of that question depends on the interpretation to be given to sections 27 and 28 of the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act of this state. (See 3 Deering’s General Laws, 1931 ed., p. 4975, Act 9059, and amendment of 1933, Stats. 1933, p. 2398.)

There is no dispute concerning the facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Knoxville Outfitting Co. v. Knoxville, Fireproof Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Russell v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Jewett v. City Transfer & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Stallman v. . KimberlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. State Bank v. Almira Farmers Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
  2. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  3. Jefferson County Cooperative Ass'n v. Northeast Kansas Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Ragan)District Court, D. Kansas · 1982
  4. In Re RaganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  5. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API