Legal Opinion

Sampsell v. Security-First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1949No. Civ. No. 16938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The instant controversy involves no disputed questions of fact. The appeal is concerned with the effect, if any, of section 1858(b) and (f) of the Civil Code upon certain warehouse receipts, and raises the question whether that code section was repealed by the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act [Stats. 1909, p. 437; 3 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 9059], adopted in 1909.

According to appellant’s brief, the complaint sought recovery from respondents “for the value of building materials warehoused by a bankrupt corporation known as Hamill-Jones Corporation with the respondent, Lawrence Warehouse Company.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jewett v. City Transfer & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Sampsell v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Boas v. De Pue Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API