Legal Opinion

Malone v. County of Del Norte

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1888No. 11585PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This action was brought by the plaintiff as the assignee of an indebtedness alleged to be due by virtue of a certain agreement, claimed to have been entered into between the county of Del Norte and L. S. P. Marsh, the assignor, as a contractor for the building of a court-house. The court below gave judgment in favor of the county of Del Norte, from which, and an order denying a new trial, this appeal is prosecuted.

*218The argument of the appellant in favor of the reversal of the judgment and order seems to be almost entirely based upon the proposition that the evidence is insufficient to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCourtney v. FortuneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Porter v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Robarts v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bowers v. CottrellIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Diefendorff v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Zen v. Koon ChanHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Haarstick v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Miller v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API