St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. White
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
(xrieein .Smith, C. J.
The question is, May one having possibility of reverter, whose right springs from a grantee’s act in discontinuing, for railway purposes, the right-of-way deeded by the reversioner’s ancestor, lawfully lay claim to a depot, outhouses, and stock pens placed upon such right-of-way .by the railway 'Company!
In 1886 those through whom appellees claim conveyed to appellants ’ predecessor a strip of land 100 feet wide, to be used “. . , for the construction, operation, maintenance, and use of a railroad over and through [the lands in question”]. There was this provision: ‘ ‘ To…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe Ex Dem. VisscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Brightwell v. International-Great Northern RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Newgass v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gibson v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In the Matter of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of State of New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. OlsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Fetzer v. Cities Service Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.