Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. White

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1939No. 4-5626PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(xrieein .Smith, C. J.

The question is, May one having possibility of reverter, whose right springs from a grantee’s act in discontinuing, for railway purposes, the right-of-way deeded by the reversioner’s ancestor, lawfully lay claim to a depot, outhouses, and stock pens placed upon such right-of-way .by the railway 'Company!

In 1886 those through whom appellees claim conveyed to appellants ’ predecessor a strip of land 100 feet wide, to be used “. . , for the construction, operation, maintenance, and use of a railroad over and through [the lands in question”]. There was this provision: ‘ ‘ To…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe Ex Dem. VisscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Brightwell v. International-Great Northern RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Newgass v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1891

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gibson v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. In the Matter of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of State of New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. OlsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Fetzer v. Cities Service Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API