Joyner v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtJennifer Caughey, Justice
Jamal Joyner was indicted for capital murder. He pleaded guilty in exchange for the State reducing the charge to the lesser-included offense of aggravated robbery and an agreement from the State that it would recommend 50 years' confinement if Joyner testified truthfully at his codefendants' trials, if he were called as a witness.
*734Joyner never testified at any codefendant's trial. The State contends that Joyner lied to the pre-trial investigator, which prevented the State from calling him as a witness.
At Joyner's sentencing, the State recommended confinement for life, and the trial court…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brandon Oneal Andrews v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
- Cameron Alexander Wheaton v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
- Domingo Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2020
- Marquis Deshawn Clark Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2021