Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Company v. Barlar

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 16, 1975No. Civ. 559PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This appeal comes from denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment.

Plaintiff brought suit on a policy of insurance. The damage claimed in the complaint was $2,500.00 together with interest. At some time subsequent to the filing and prior to entering the default judgment, the complaint was amended without service upon defendant as required by Rule 5(a) Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. Amendment was by interlining the complaint and increasing the sum from $2,500.-00 to $2,856.00.

Defendant defaulted. Judgment was given plaintiff in the amount of $2,856.00. Several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pruitt v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Linker v. Batavian National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Meadow Brook National Bank v. WhiteheadNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Foy v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Producers Equipment Sales, Inc. v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. Rooney v. Southern Dependacare, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Hallmark v. HallmarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API