Legal Opinion

People v. Coleman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 29, 2011No. 1-09-0417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE

Presiding Justice Garcia and Justice Cahill concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Following a bench trial, defendant Jesse Coleman was convicted of violating the armed habitual criminal statute (720 ILCS 5/24—1.7 (West 2006)). He was sentenced to eight years in prison. Defendant appeals, arguing that: (1) the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant violated the armed habitual criminal statute because the name on one of the certified copies of conviction entered as evidence of a prior offense did not match defendant’s name; (2) the armed habitual criminal statute…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GarvinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. People v. RennieAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API