Legal Opinion

Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Butts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 2008No. A08A0428PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Rheem Manufacturing Company appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment contending that the plaintiffs claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act. We granted Rheem’s application for interlocutory appeal.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo and construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Home Builders Assn. of Savannah v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Doss v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Hennly v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Davis v. StoverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Savannah Hospitality Servs., LLC. v. ScrivenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Home Depot v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Baker v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
  5. Savannah Hospitality Services, LLC v. James H. ScrivenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API