Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. J. F. Brunken & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 23, 1973No. Civ. 72-4036PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action, 28 U.S.C. Secs. 2201 and 2202, brought by a surety, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), to determine priorities between conflicting claimants to the property of J. F. Brunken & Son, Inc. (Brunken), or the proceeds thereof, now in the possession of the court-appointed receiver. In addition to the Brunken Corporation, those defendants remaining in the suit at the time of trial were the National Bank of South Dakota (NBSD) and Northwestern National Bank (NWB), both asserting security interests in the Brunken…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Warren Tool Co. v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- In the Matter of Robert Charles Shelton, Edwin J. Gasaway, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Raymond ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- In The Matter Of J. V. Gleason Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- National Surety Corp. v. State National Bank of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Merts Equipment Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1977
- General Insurance Co. of America v. LowryDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1976
- Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LeachDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.