Legal Opinion

National Surety Corp. v. State National Bank of Frankfort

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 22, 1970PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORNE, Judge.

At issue in this case is who, as between a surety company on a contractor’s performance bond and a lending bank, is entitled to collect payments for work performed by a defaulting contractor? The facts of the case are as follows:

In March of 1966, Ronald Pulliam entered into a contract with the Whitten-berg Engineering and Construction Company to perform electrical work in the construction of a dormitory on the campus of Morehead University. In October of 1966, the same parties entered into a similar contract in connection with the construction of a science building on the same…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Jacobs v. Northeastern Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Farmers' Bank v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Eli Witt Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. MataticsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Canter v. SchlagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. In The Matter Of J. V. Gleason Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Finance Co. of America v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Alaska State Bank v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API