Seekins v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action for damages sustained when plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by her husband, was injured when the latter drove it into defendant’s ore train while it was in a stationary position on a crossing at South Grove Road near South Grove Addition to Mountain Iron, St. Louis County. At the close of the testimony, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant railroad. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied, and this is an appeal from the judgment entered for defendant.
In directing the verdict, the trial court stated:
“* * *…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Ausen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Massmann v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Winge v. Minnesota Transfer Railway CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971