Legal Opinion

Seekins v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1960No. 37,886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action for damages sustained when plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by her husband, was injured when the latter drove it into defendant’s ore train while it was in a stationary position on a crossing at South Grove Road near South Grove Addition to Mountain Iron, St. Louis County. At the close of the testimony, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant railroad. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied, and this is an appeal from the judgment entered for defendant.

In directing the verdict, the trial court stated:

“* * *…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Ausen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Massmann v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winge v. Minnesota Transfer Railway CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Gagnier v. BendixenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API