United States v. Peet
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Peet brought this action against the United States on a policy of war risk insurance. The policy lapsed on March 1, 1919, for nonpayment of premiums unless on or prior to that date Peet became totally and permanently disabled.
On a former appeal we held the evidence failed to establish total disability and reversed a judgment in favor of Peet and remanded the cause for a new trial-United States v. Peet (C.C.A.10) 59 F.(2d) 728. On a second trial the lower court again found the issues of fact in favor of Peet and awarded judgment accordingly. The United States has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. PeetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.