Legal Opinion

United States v. Peet

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1937No. 1440Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Peet brought this action against the United States on a policy of war risk insurance. The policy lapsed on March 1, 1919, for nonpayment of premiums unless on or prior to that date Peet became totally and permanently disabled.

On a former appeal we held the evidence failed to establish total disability and reversed a judgment in favor of Peet and remanded the cause for a new trial-United States v. Peet (C.C.A.10) 59 F.(2d) 728. On a second trial the lower court again found the issues of fact in favor of Peet and awarded judgment accordingly. The United States has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. PeetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API